← My Auto Racer All cars Comparisons Answers 0-60 by make Fastest lists

Ford Puma 1.5 EcoBlue 120 vs Skoda Scala 1.0 G-TEC 90

Over a standing quarter mile on dry asphalt the Ford Puma 1.5 EcoBlue 120 is the quicker car, covering it in 16.99 s at 80.9 mph against the Skoda Scala 1.0 G-TEC 90’s 18.08 s — a margin of 1.09 s. To 60 mph the Ford Puma 1.5 EcoBlue 120 takes 9.37 s and the Skoda Scala 1.0 G-TEC 90 11.25 s.

Simulated, not measured — computed from each car’s published kerb mass, rated power and drivetrain, then fitted to its own published acceleration figures. Dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.

Ford Puma 1.5 EcoBlue 120 Skoda Scala 1.0 G-TEC 90

Watch the run in full — then change the surface, the weather or the distance and run it again.

Down the strip

Standing startFord Puma 1.5 EcoBlue 120Skoda Scala 1.0 G-TEC 90
0–60 mph9.37 s11.25 s
0–100 mph——
60 ft2.52 s2.67 s
1/8 mile10.90 s11.57 s
1/4 mile16.99 s18.08 s
Trap speed80.9 mph75.2 mph

Each car is trimmed to its own published figures — 2/2 for the Ford Puma 1.5 EcoBlue 120, 2/2 for the Skoda Scala 1.0 G-TEC 90 — so a heavier car can still be the quicker one if that is what it tests.

On paper

SpecificationFord Puma 1.5 EcoBlue 120Skoda Scala 1.0 G-TEC 90
Year20192019
Power118 bhp89 bhp
Kerb mass1,348 kg1,197 kg
Power to weight88 bhp/t74 bhp/t
DrivetrainFront driveFront drive
EngineTurbodieselTurbocharged

Where these times sit

0-60 under 10 seconds10,147 cars0-100 km/h under 10 seconds9,071 carsSlower in the wetevery car, re-runThe cost of altitudeevery car, re-runThe cost of a passengerevery car, re-run
Ford 0-60 timesevery modelSkoda 0-60 timesevery modelFastest hatchbacks4,527 carsFastest cars of the 2010s4,546 cars

Try another matchup

Put this race on your own page

Free to use anywhere, no attribution required beyond the credit line included above. How to embed →

Or open the full simulator →

Questions

Is the Ford Puma 1.5 EcoBlue 120 or the Skoda Scala 1.0 G-TEC 90 faster?
The Ford Puma 1.5 EcoBlue 120. Over a standing quarter mile it runs 16.99 s to the Skoda Scala 1.0 G-TEC 90's 18.08 s, a margin of 1.09 s, and it reaches 60 mph in 9.37 s against 11.25 s. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
What is the Ford Puma 1.5 EcoBlue 120 0-60 time?
The Ford Puma 1.5 EcoBlue 120 reaches 60 mph in 9.37 s, simulated on dry asphalt at 20 °C with a 1 ft rollout. It covers the standing quarter mile in 16.99 s at 80.9 mph.
What is the Skoda Scala 1.0 G-TEC 90 0-60 time?
The Skoda Scala 1.0 G-TEC 90 reaches 60 mph in 11.25 s, simulated on dry asphalt at 20 °C with a 1 ft rollout. It covers the standing quarter mile in 18.08 s at 75.2 mph.
What trap speed does each car run?
The Ford Puma 1.5 EcoBlue 120 trips the lights at 80.9 mph and the Skoda Scala 1.0 G-TEC 90 at 75.2 mph at the end of the quarter mile. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
Are these real measured times?
No. Every time on this page is produced by a physics simulation, not by a stopwatch at a drag strip. Each car is modelled from its published kerb mass, rated power, drivetrain and gearing, then trimmed until it matches its own published acceleration figures — 2 of 2 for the Ford Puma 1.5 EcoBlue 120 and 2 of 2 for the Skoda Scala 1.0 G-TEC 90. Conditions are identical for both cars: dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.

Figures regenerated 2026-10-12. Every number on this page is computed by the simulator at build time, so the page and the app can never disagree.