← My Auto Racer All cars Comparisons Answers 0-60 by make Fastest lists

Honda CR-V 2.0 i-VTEC 155 (2016) vs Toyota Corolla Cross 2.0 e-CVT 197

Over a standing quarter mile on dry asphalt the Toyota Corolla Cross 2.0 e-CVT 197 is the quicker car, covering it in 15.35 s at 86.3 mph against the Honda CR-V 2.0 i-VTEC 155 (2016)’s 18.43 s — a margin of 3.08 s. To 60 mph the Toyota Corolla Cross 2.0 e-CVT 197 takes 6.68 s and the Honda CR-V 2.0 i-VTEC 155 (2016) 11.18 s.

Simulated, not measured — computed from each car’s published kerb mass, rated power and drivetrain, then fitted to its own published acceleration figures. Dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.

Honda CR-V 2.0 i-VTEC 155 (2016) Toyota Corolla Cross 2.0 e-CVT 197

Watch the run in full — then change the surface, the weather or the distance and run it again.

Down the strip

Standing startHonda CR-V 2.0 i-VTEC 155 (2016)Toyota Corolla Cross 2.0 e-CVT 197
0–60 mph11.18 s6.68 s
0–100 mph——
60 ft3.23 s2.26 s
1/8 mile12.06 s9.69 s
1/4 mile18.43 s15.35 s
Trap speed77.4 mph86.3 mph

Each car is trimmed to its own published figures — 2/2 for the Honda CR-V 2.0 i-VTEC 155 (2016), 2/2 for the Toyota Corolla Cross 2.0 e-CVT 197 — so a heavier car can still be the quicker one if that is what it tests.

On paper

SpecificationHonda CR-V 2.0 i-VTEC 155 (2016)Toyota Corolla Cross 2.0 e-CVT 197
Year20162022
Power153 bhp150 bhp
Kerb mass1,543 kg1,508 kg
Power to weight99 bhp/t100 bhp/t
DrivetrainAll-wheel driveAll-wheel drive
EngineNaturally aspiratedNaturally aspirated

Where these times sit

0-60 under 7 seconds4,657 cars0-100 km/h under 8 seconds5,609 carsSlower in the wetevery car, re-runThe cost of altitudeevery car, re-runThe cost of a passengerevery car, re-run
Honda 0-60 timesevery modelToyota 0-60 timesevery modelFastest SUVs2,062 cars

Try another matchup

Put this race on your own page

Free to use anywhere, no attribution required beyond the credit line included above. How to embed →

Or open the full simulator →

Questions

Is the Honda CR-V 2.0 i-VTEC 155 (2016) or the Toyota Corolla Cross 2.0 e-CVT 197 faster?
The Toyota Corolla Cross 2.0 e-CVT 197. Over a standing quarter mile it runs 15.35 s to the Honda CR-V 2.0 i-VTEC 155 (2016)'s 18.43 s, a margin of 3.08 s, and it reaches 60 mph in 6.68 s against 11.18 s. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
What is the Honda CR-V 2.0 i-VTEC 155 (2016) 0-60 time?
The Honda CR-V 2.0 i-VTEC 155 (2016) reaches 60 mph in 11.18 s, simulated on dry asphalt at 20 °C with a 1 ft rollout. It covers the standing quarter mile in 18.43 s at 77.4 mph.
What is the Toyota Corolla Cross 2.0 e-CVT 197 0-60 time?
The Toyota Corolla Cross 2.0 e-CVT 197 reaches 60 mph in 6.68 s, simulated on dry asphalt at 20 °C with a 1 ft rollout. It covers the standing quarter mile in 15.35 s at 86.3 mph.
What trap speed does each car run?
The Honda CR-V 2.0 i-VTEC 155 (2016) trips the lights at 77.4 mph and the Toyota Corolla Cross 2.0 e-CVT 197 at 86.3 mph at the end of the quarter mile. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
Are these real measured times?
No. Every time on this page is produced by a physics simulation, not by a stopwatch at a drag strip. Each car is modelled from its published kerb mass, rated power, drivetrain and gearing, then trimmed until it matches its own published acceleration figures — 2 of 2 for the Honda CR-V 2.0 i-VTEC 155 (2016) and 2 of 2 for the Toyota Corolla Cross 2.0 e-CVT 197. Conditions are identical for both cars: dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.

Figures regenerated 2026-10-12. Every number on this page is computed by the simulator at build time, so the page and the app can never disagree.