Over a standing quarter mile on dry asphalt the Infiniti QX50 2.0 CVT 268 is the quicker car,
covering it in 14.58 s at
97.7 mph against the Mazda CX-3 1.5 105’s
17.82 s — a margin of
3.24 s. To 60 mph the Infiniti QX50 2.0 CVT 268 takes
6.01 s and the Mazda CX-3 1.5 105
10.68 s.
Simulated, not measured — computed from each car’s published kerb mass,
rated power and drivetrain, then fitted to its own published acceleration figures.
Dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.
Mazda CX-3 1.5 105Infiniti QX50 2.0 CVT 268
Watch the run in full — then change the surface, the weather
or the distance and run it again.
Down the strip
Standing start
Mazda CX-3 1.5 105
Infiniti QX50 2.0 CVT 268
0–60 mph
10.68 s
6.01 s
0–100 mph
—
—
60 ft
2.59 s
2.47 s
1/8 mile
11.30 s
9.54 s
1/4 mile
17.82 s
14.58 s
Trap speed
75.4 mph
97.7 mph
Each car is trimmed to its own published figures —
2/2 for the Mazda CX-3 1.5 105,
2/2 for the Infiniti QX50 2.0 CVT 268 —
so a heavier car can still be the quicker one if that is what it tests.
Is the Mazda CX-3 1.5 105 or the Infiniti QX50 2.0 CVT 268 faster?
The Infiniti QX50 2.0 CVT 268. Over a standing quarter mile it runs 14.58 s to the Mazda CX-3 1.5 105's 17.82 s, a margin of 3.24 s, and it reaches 60 mph in 6.01 s against 10.68 s. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
What is the Mazda CX-3 1.5 105 0-60 time?
The Mazda CX-3 1.5 105 reaches 60 mph in 10.68 s, simulated on dry asphalt at 20 °C with a 1 ft rollout. It covers the standing quarter mile in 17.82 s at 75.4 mph.
What is the Infiniti QX50 2.0 CVT 268 0-60 time?
The Infiniti QX50 2.0 CVT 268 reaches 60 mph in 6.01 s, simulated on dry asphalt at 20 °C with a 1 ft rollout. It covers the standing quarter mile in 14.58 s at 97.7 mph.
What trap speed does each car run?
The Mazda CX-3 1.5 105 trips the lights at 75.4 mph and the Infiniti QX50 2.0 CVT 268 at 97.7 mph at the end of the quarter mile. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
Are these real measured times?
No. Every time on this page is produced by a physics simulation, not by a stopwatch at a drag strip. Each car is modelled from its published kerb mass, rated power, drivetrain and gearing, then trimmed until it matches its own published acceleration figures — 2 of 2 for the Mazda CX-3 1.5 105 and 2 of 2 for the Infiniti QX50 2.0 CVT 268. Conditions are identical for both cars: dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.
Figures regenerated 2026-10-12. Every number on this page is computed by the simulator at build time, so the page and the app can never disagree.