← My Auto Racer All cars Comparisons Answers 0-60 by make Fastest lists

Mercedes-Benz E-Class E 200 204 vs Mercedes-Benz E-Class T-Modell (S 212) 200 BlueEFFICIENCY 184

Over a standing quarter mile on dry asphalt the Mercedes-Benz E-Class E 200 204 is the quicker car, covering it in 15.15 s at 92.5 mph against the Mercedes-Benz E-Class T-Modell (S 212) 200 BlueEFFICIENCY 184’s 16.07 s — a margin of 0.92 s. To 60 mph the Mercedes-Benz E-Class E 200 204 takes 6.77 s and the Mercedes-Benz E-Class T-Modell (S 212) 200 BlueEFFICIENCY 184 7.88 s.

Simulated, not measured — computed from each car’s published kerb mass, rated power and drivetrain, then fitted to its own published acceleration figures. Dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.

Mercedes-Benz E-Class E 200 204 Mercedes-Benz E-Class T-Modell (S 212) 200 BlueEFFICIENCY 184

Watch the run in full — then change the surface, the weather or the distance and run it again.

Down the strip

Standing startMercedes-Benz E-Class E 200 204Mercedes-Benz E-Class T-Modell (S 212) 200 BlueEFFICIENCY 184
0–60 mph6.77 s7.88 s
0–100 mph——
60 ft2.34 s2.47 s
1/8 mile9.77 s10.36 s
1/4 mile15.15 s16.07 s
Trap speed92.5 mph87.5 mph

Each car is trimmed to its own published figures — 2/2 for the Mercedes-Benz E-Class E 200 204, 2/2 for the Mercedes-Benz E-Class T-Modell (S 212) 200 BlueEFFICIENCY 184 — so a heavier car can still be the quicker one if that is what it tests.

On paper

SpecificationMercedes-Benz E-Class E 200 204Mercedes-Benz E-Class T-Modell (S 212) 200 BlueEFFICIENCY 184
Year20242009
Power201 bhp181 bhp
Kerb mass1,825 kg1,735 kg
Power to weight110 bhp/t104 bhp/t
DrivetrainRear driveRear drive
EngineTurbochargedTurbocharged

Where these times sit

0-60 under 7 seconds4,657 cars0-100 km/h under 8 seconds5,609 carsSlower in the wetevery car, re-runThe cost of altitudeevery car, re-runThe cost of a passengerevery car, re-run
Mercedes-Benz 0-60 timesevery model

Try another matchup

Put this race on your own page

Free to use anywhere, no attribution required beyond the credit line included above. How to embed →

Or open the full simulator →

Questions

Is the Mercedes-Benz E-Class E 200 204 or the Mercedes-Benz E-Class T-Modell (S 212) 200 BlueEFFICIENCY 184 faster?
The Mercedes-Benz E-Class E 200 204. Over a standing quarter mile it runs 15.15 s to the Mercedes-Benz E-Class T-Modell (S 212) 200 BlueEFFICIENCY 184's 16.07 s, a margin of 0.92 s, and it reaches 60 mph in 6.77 s against 7.88 s. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
What is the Mercedes-Benz E-Class E 200 204 0-60 time?
The Mercedes-Benz E-Class E 200 204 reaches 60 mph in 6.77 s, simulated on dry asphalt at 20 °C with a 1 ft rollout. It covers the standing quarter mile in 15.15 s at 92.5 mph.
What is the Mercedes-Benz E-Class T-Modell (S 212) 200 BlueEFFICIENCY 184 0-60 time?
The Mercedes-Benz E-Class T-Modell (S 212) 200 BlueEFFICIENCY 184 reaches 60 mph in 7.88 s, simulated on dry asphalt at 20 °C with a 1 ft rollout. It covers the standing quarter mile in 16.07 s at 87.5 mph.
What trap speed does each car run?
The Mercedes-Benz E-Class E 200 204 trips the lights at 92.5 mph and the Mercedes-Benz E-Class T-Modell (S 212) 200 BlueEFFICIENCY 184 at 87.5 mph at the end of the quarter mile. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
Are these real measured times?
No. Every time on this page is produced by a physics simulation, not by a stopwatch at a drag strip. Each car is modelled from its published kerb mass, rated power, drivetrain and gearing, then trimmed until it matches its own published acceleration figures — 2 of 2 for the Mercedes-Benz E-Class E 200 204 and 2 of 2 for the Mercedes-Benz E-Class T-Modell (S 212) 200 BlueEFFICIENCY 184. Conditions are identical for both cars: dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.

Figures regenerated 2026-10-12. Every number on this page is computed by the simulator at build time, so the page and the app can never disagree.