Nissan Juke 1.6i 117 vs Lamborghini Huracan Performante
Over a standing quarter mile on dry asphalt the Lamborghini Huracan Performante is the quicker car,
covering it in 10.36 s at
134.6 mph against the Nissan Juke 1.6i 117’s
17.63 s — a margin of
7.27 s. To 60 mph the Lamborghini Huracan Performante takes
2.55 s and the Nissan Juke 1.6i 117
10.02 s.
Simulated, not measured — computed from each car’s published kerb mass,
rated power and drivetrain, then fitted to its own published acceleration figures.
Dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.
Watch the run in full — then change the surface, the weather
or the distance and run it again.
Down the strip
Standing start
Nissan Juke 1.6i 117
Lamborghini Huracan Performante
0–60 mph
10.02 s
2.55 s
0–100 mph
—
5.68 s
60 ft
2.95 s
1.63 s
1/8 mile
11.43 s
6.69 s
1/4 mile
17.63 s
10.36 s
Trap speed
79.6 mph
134.6 mph
Each car is trimmed to its own published figures —
2/2 for the Nissan Juke 1.6i 117,
4/4 for the Lamborghini Huracan Performante —
so a heavier car can still be the quicker one if that is what it tests.
Is the Nissan Juke 1.6i 117 or the Lamborghini Huracan Performante faster?
The Lamborghini Huracan Performante. Over a standing quarter mile it runs 10.36 s to the Nissan Juke 1.6i 117's 17.63 s, a margin of 7.27 s, and it reaches 60 mph in 2.55 s against 10.02 s. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
What is the Nissan Juke 1.6i 117 0-60 time?
The Nissan Juke 1.6i 117 reaches 60 mph in 10.02 s, simulated on dry asphalt at 20 °C with a 1 ft rollout. It covers the standing quarter mile in 17.63 s at 79.6 mph.
What is the Lamborghini Huracan Performante 0-60 time?
The Lamborghini Huracan Performante reaches 60 mph in 2.55 s, simulated on dry asphalt at 20 °C with a 1 ft rollout. It covers the standing quarter mile in 10.36 s at 134.6 mph.
What trap speed does each car run?
The Nissan Juke 1.6i 117 trips the lights at 79.6 mph and the Lamborghini Huracan Performante at 134.6 mph at the end of the quarter mile. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
Are these real measured times?
No. Every time on this page is produced by a physics simulation, not by a stopwatch at a drag strip. Each car is modelled from its published kerb mass, rated power, drivetrain and gearing, then trimmed until it matches its own published acceleration figures — 2 of 2 for the Nissan Juke 1.6i 117 and 4 of 4 for the Lamborghini Huracan Performante. Conditions are identical for both cars: dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.
Figures regenerated 2026-10-12. Every number on this page is computed by the simulator at build time, so the page and the app can never disagree.