← My Auto Racer All cars Comparisons Answers 0-60 by make Fastest lists

Range Rover Sport SVR Mk II facelift vs Jeep GRAND CHEROKEE TRACKHAWK 6.2 HEMI V8 719

Over a standing quarter mile on dry asphalt the Jeep GRAND CHEROKEE TRACKHAWK 6.2 HEMI V8 719 is the quicker car, covering it in 11.53 s at 119.0 mph against the Range Rover Sport SVR Mk II facelift’s 12.43 s — a margin of 0.90 s. To 60 mph the Jeep GRAND CHEROKEE TRACKHAWK 6.2 HEMI V8 719 takes 3.16 s and the Range Rover Sport SVR Mk II facelift 3.90 s.

Simulated, not measured — computed from each car’s published kerb mass, rated power and drivetrain, then fitted to its own published acceleration figures. Dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.

Range Rover Sport SVR Mk II facelift Jeep GRAND CHEROKEE TRACKHAWK 6.2 HEMI V8 719

Watch the run in full — then change the surface, the weather or the distance and run it again.

Down the strip

Standing startRange Rover Sport SVR Mk II faceliftJeep GRAND CHEROKEE TRACKHAWK 6.2 HEMI V8 719
0–60 mph3.90 s3.16 s
0–100 mph9.81 s8.08 s
60 ft1.93 s1.67 s
1/8 mile8.00 s7.37 s
1/4 mile12.43 s11.53 s
Trap speed111.8 mph119.0 mph

Each car is trimmed to its own published figures — 9/10 for the Range Rover Sport SVR Mk II facelift, 2/2 for the Jeep GRAND CHEROKEE TRACKHAWK 6.2 HEMI V8 719 — so a heavier car can still be the quicker one if that is what it tests.

On paper

SpecificationRange Rover Sport SVR Mk II faceliftJeep GRAND CHEROKEE TRACKHAWK 6.2 HEMI V8 719
Year20182018
Power567 bhp709 bhp
Kerb mass2,310 kg2,433 kg
Power to weight246 bhp/t292 bhp/t
DrivetrainAll-wheel driveAll-wheel drive
EngineTurbochargedTurbocharged

Where these times sit

0-60 under 4 seconds1,060 cars0-100 km/h under 4 seconds881 carsQuarter mile under 12 seconds780 cars0-100 under 9 seconds871 carsTraps over 110 mph1,380 carsSlower in the wetevery car, re-runThe cost of altitudeevery car, re-runThe cost of a passengerevery car, re-run
Range Rover 0-60 timesevery modelJeep 0-60 timesevery modelFastest SUVs2,062 carsFastest cars of the 2010s4,546 cars

Try another matchup

Put this race on your own page

Free to use anywhere, no attribution required beyond the credit line included above. How to embed →

Or open the full simulator →

Questions

Is the Range Rover Sport SVR Mk II facelift or the Jeep GRAND CHEROKEE TRACKHAWK 6.2 HEMI V8 719 faster?
The Jeep GRAND CHEROKEE TRACKHAWK 6.2 HEMI V8 719. Over a standing quarter mile it runs 11.53 s to the Range Rover Sport SVR Mk II facelift's 12.43 s, a margin of 0.90 s, and it reaches 60 mph in 3.16 s against 3.90 s. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
What is the Range Rover Sport SVR Mk II facelift 0-60 time?
The Range Rover Sport SVR Mk II facelift reaches 60 mph in 3.90 s, simulated on dry asphalt at 20 °C with a 1 ft rollout. It covers the standing quarter mile in 12.43 s at 111.8 mph.
What is the Jeep GRAND CHEROKEE TRACKHAWK 6.2 HEMI V8 719 0-60 time?
The Jeep GRAND CHEROKEE TRACKHAWK 6.2 HEMI V8 719 reaches 60 mph in 3.16 s, simulated on dry asphalt at 20 °C with a 1 ft rollout. It covers the standing quarter mile in 11.53 s at 119.0 mph.
What trap speed does each car run?
The Range Rover Sport SVR Mk II facelift trips the lights at 111.8 mph and the Jeep GRAND CHEROKEE TRACKHAWK 6.2 HEMI V8 719 at 119.0 mph at the end of the quarter mile. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
Are these real measured times?
No. Every time on this page is produced by a physics simulation, not by a stopwatch at a drag strip. Each car is modelled from its published kerb mass, rated power, drivetrain and gearing, then trimmed until it matches its own published acceleration figures — 9 of 10 for the Range Rover Sport SVR Mk II facelift and 2 of 2 for the Jeep GRAND CHEROKEE TRACKHAWK 6.2 HEMI V8 719. Conditions are identical for both cars: dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.

Figures regenerated 2026-10-12. Every number on this page is computed by the simulator at build time, so the page and the app can never disagree.