← My Auto Racer All cars Comparisons Answers 0-60 by make Fastest lists

Renault Clio Estate 1.2 75 vs Suzuki Baleno 1.0 BOOSTERJET 111

Over a standing quarter mile on dry asphalt the Suzuki Baleno 1.0 BOOSTERJET 111 is the quicker car, covering it in 17.63 s at 78.6 mph against the Renault Clio Estate 1.2 75’s 19.57 s — a margin of 1.95 s. To 60 mph the Suzuki Baleno 1.0 BOOSTERJET 111 takes 10.36 s and the Renault Clio Estate 1.2 75 13.21 s.

Simulated, not measured — computed from each car’s published kerb mass, rated power and drivetrain, then fitted to its own published acceleration figures. Dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.

Renault Clio Estate 1.2 75 Suzuki Baleno 1.0 BOOSTERJET 111

Watch the run in full — then change the surface, the weather or the distance and run it again.

Down the strip

Standing startRenault Clio Estate 1.2 75Suzuki Baleno 1.0 BOOSTERJET 111
0–60 mph13.21 s10.36 s
0–100 mph——
60 ft3.36 s2.88 s
1/8 mile12.76 s11.40 s
1/4 mile19.57 s17.63 s
Trap speed72.3 mph78.6 mph

Each car is trimmed to its own published figures — 2/2 for the Renault Clio Estate 1.2 75, 2/2 for the Suzuki Baleno 1.0 BOOSTERJET 111 — so a heavier car can still be the quicker one if that is what it tests.

On paper

SpecificationRenault Clio Estate 1.2 75Suzuki Baleno 1.0 BOOSTERJET 111
Year20162016
Power74 bhp110 bhp
Kerb mass1,066 kg980 kg
Power to weight69 bhp/t112 bhp/t
DrivetrainFront driveFront drive
EngineNaturally aspiratedTurbocharged

Where these times sit

Slower in the wetevery car, re-runThe cost of altitudeevery car, re-runThe cost of a passengerevery car, re-run
Renault 0-60 timesevery modelSuzuki 0-60 timesevery modelFastest cars of the 2010s4,546 cars

Try another matchup

Put this race on your own page

Free to use anywhere, no attribution required beyond the credit line included above. How to embed →

Or open the full simulator →

Questions

Is the Renault Clio Estate 1.2 75 or the Suzuki Baleno 1.0 BOOSTERJET 111 faster?
The Suzuki Baleno 1.0 BOOSTERJET 111. Over a standing quarter mile it runs 17.63 s to the Renault Clio Estate 1.2 75's 19.57 s, a margin of 1.95 s, and it reaches 60 mph in 10.36 s against 13.21 s. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
What is the Renault Clio Estate 1.2 75 0-60 time?
The Renault Clio Estate 1.2 75 reaches 60 mph in 13.21 s, simulated on dry asphalt at 20 °C with a 1 ft rollout. It covers the standing quarter mile in 19.57 s at 72.3 mph.
What is the Suzuki Baleno 1.0 BOOSTERJET 111 0-60 time?
The Suzuki Baleno 1.0 BOOSTERJET 111 reaches 60 mph in 10.36 s, simulated on dry asphalt at 20 °C with a 1 ft rollout. It covers the standing quarter mile in 17.63 s at 78.6 mph.
What trap speed does each car run?
The Renault Clio Estate 1.2 75 trips the lights at 72.3 mph and the Suzuki Baleno 1.0 BOOSTERJET 111 at 78.6 mph at the end of the quarter mile. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
Are these real measured times?
No. Every time on this page is produced by a physics simulation, not by a stopwatch at a drag strip. Each car is modelled from its published kerb mass, rated power, drivetrain and gearing, then trimmed until it matches its own published acceleration figures — 2 of 2 for the Renault Clio Estate 1.2 75 and 2 of 2 for the Suzuki Baleno 1.0 BOOSTERJET 111. Conditions are identical for both cars: dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.

Figures regenerated 2026-10-12. Every number on this page is computed by the simulator at build time, so the page and the app can never disagree.