← My Auto Racer All cars Comparisons Answers 0-60 by make Fastest lists

Volkswagen Polo 1.0 TSI 95 vs Toyota Aygo X 1.0 VVT-i 72

Over a standing quarter mile on dry asphalt the Volkswagen Polo 1.0 TSI 95 is the quicker car, covering it in 17.45 s at 78.8 mph against the Toyota Aygo X 1.0 VVT-i 72’s 19.80 s — a margin of 2.35 s. To 60 mph the Volkswagen Polo 1.0 TSI 95 takes 9.92 s and the Toyota Aygo X 1.0 VVT-i 72 14.14 s.

Simulated, not measured — computed from each car’s published kerb mass, rated power and drivetrain, then fitted to its own published acceleration figures. Dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.

Volkswagen Polo 1.0 TSI 95 Toyota Aygo X 1.0 VVT-i 72

Watch the run in full — then change the surface, the weather or the distance and run it again.

Down the strip

Standing startVolkswagen Polo 1.0 TSI 95Toyota Aygo X 1.0 VVT-i 72
0–60 mph9.92 s14.14 s
0–100 mph——
60 ft2.77 s3.07 s
1/8 mile11.21 s12.72 s
1/4 mile17.45 s19.80 s
Trap speed78.8 mph69.5 mph

Each car is trimmed to its own published figures — 2/2 for the Volkswagen Polo 1.0 TSI 95, 2/2 for the Toyota Aygo X 1.0 VVT-i 72 — so a heavier car can still be the quicker one if that is what it tests.

On paper

SpecificationVolkswagen Polo 1.0 TSI 95Toyota Aygo X 1.0 VVT-i 72
Year20222021
Power94 bhp71 bhp
Kerb mass1,165 kg940 kg
Power to weight81 bhp/t76 bhp/t
DrivetrainFront driveFront drive
EngineTurbochargedNaturally aspirated

Where these times sit

0-60 under 10 seconds10,147 carsSlower in the wetevery car, re-runThe cost of altitudeevery car, re-runThe cost of a passengerevery car, re-run
Volkswagen 0-60 timesevery modelToyota 0-60 timesevery modelFastest hatchbacks4,527 carsFastest cars of the 2020s868 cars

Try another matchup

Put this race on your own page

Free to use anywhere, no attribution required beyond the credit line included above. How to embed →

Or open the full simulator →

Questions

Is the Volkswagen Polo 1.0 TSI 95 or the Toyota Aygo X 1.0 VVT-i 72 faster?
The Volkswagen Polo 1.0 TSI 95. Over a standing quarter mile it runs 17.45 s to the Toyota Aygo X 1.0 VVT-i 72's 19.80 s, a margin of 2.35 s, and it reaches 60 mph in 9.92 s against 14.14 s. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
What is the Volkswagen Polo 1.0 TSI 95 0-60 time?
The Volkswagen Polo 1.0 TSI 95 reaches 60 mph in 9.92 s, simulated on dry asphalt at 20 °C with a 1 ft rollout. It covers the standing quarter mile in 17.45 s at 78.8 mph.
What is the Toyota Aygo X 1.0 VVT-i 72 0-60 time?
The Toyota Aygo X 1.0 VVT-i 72 reaches 60 mph in 14.14 s, simulated on dry asphalt at 20 °C with a 1 ft rollout. It covers the standing quarter mile in 19.80 s at 69.5 mph.
What trap speed does each car run?
The Volkswagen Polo 1.0 TSI 95 trips the lights at 78.8 mph and the Toyota Aygo X 1.0 VVT-i 72 at 69.5 mph at the end of the quarter mile. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
Are these real measured times?
No. Every time on this page is produced by a physics simulation, not by a stopwatch at a drag strip. Each car is modelled from its published kerb mass, rated power, drivetrain and gearing, then trimmed until it matches its own published acceleration figures — 2 of 2 for the Volkswagen Polo 1.0 TSI 95 and 2 of 2 for the Toyota Aygo X 1.0 VVT-i 72. Conditions are identical for both cars: dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.

Figures regenerated 2026-10-12. Every number on this page is computed by the simulator at build time, so the page and the app can never disagree.