← My Auto Racer All cars Comparisons Answers 0-60 by make Fastest lists

Volvo XC60 3.2 243 vs Mercedes-AMG GLC 43 X253 367 PS

Over a standing quarter mile on dry asphalt the Mercedes-AMG GLC 43 X253 367 PS is the quicker car, covering it in 13.13 s at 104.2 mph against the Volvo XC60 3.2 243’s 16.95 s — a margin of 3.82 s. To 60 mph the Mercedes-AMG GLC 43 X253 367 PS takes 4.55 s and the Volvo XC60 3.2 243 8.95 s.

Simulated, not measured — computed from each car’s published kerb mass, rated power and drivetrain, then fitted to its own published acceleration figures. Dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.

Volvo XC60 3.2 243 Mercedes-AMG GLC 43 X253 367 PS

Watch the run in full — then change the surface, the weather or the distance and run it again.

Down the strip

Standing startVolvo XC60 3.2 243Mercedes-AMG GLC 43 X253 367 PS
0–60 mph8.95 s4.55 s
0–100 mph—11.79 s
60 ft2.80 s1.98 s
1/8 mile10.98 s8.42 s
1/4 mile16.95 s13.13 s
Trap speed83.3 mph104.2 mph

Each car is trimmed to its own published figures — 2/2 for the Volvo XC60 3.2 243, 9/10 for the Mercedes-AMG GLC 43 X253 367 PS — so a heavier car can still be the quicker one if that is what it tests.

On paper

SpecificationVolvo XC60 3.2 243Mercedes-AMG GLC 43 X253 367 PS
Year20082016
Power240 bhp362 bhp
Kerb mass1,942 kg1,885 kg
Power to weight124 bhp/t192 bhp/t
DrivetrainAll-wheel driveAll-wheel drive
EngineNaturally aspiratedTurbocharged

Where these times sit

0-60 under 5 seconds2,159 cars0-100 km/h under 5 seconds1,846 carsQuarter mile under 14 seconds2,646 cars0-100 under 12 seconds1,964 carsSlower in the wetevery car, re-runThe cost of altitudeevery car, re-runThe cost of a passengerevery car, re-run
Volvo 0-60 timesevery modelMercedes-AMG 0-60 timesevery modelFastest SUVs2,062 cars

Try another matchup

Put this race on your own page

Free to use anywhere, no attribution required beyond the credit line included above. How to embed →

Or open the full simulator →

Questions

Is the Volvo XC60 3.2 243 or the Mercedes-AMG GLC 43 X253 367 PS faster?
The Mercedes-AMG GLC 43 X253 367 PS. Over a standing quarter mile it runs 13.13 s to the Volvo XC60 3.2 243's 16.95 s, a margin of 3.82 s, and it reaches 60 mph in 4.55 s against 8.95 s. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
What is the Volvo XC60 3.2 243 0-60 time?
The Volvo XC60 3.2 243 reaches 60 mph in 8.95 s, simulated on dry asphalt at 20 °C with a 1 ft rollout. It covers the standing quarter mile in 16.95 s at 83.3 mph.
What is the Mercedes-AMG GLC 43 X253 367 PS 0-60 time?
The Mercedes-AMG GLC 43 X253 367 PS reaches 60 mph in 4.55 s, simulated on dry asphalt at 20 °C with a 1 ft rollout. It covers the standing quarter mile in 13.13 s at 104.2 mph.
What trap speed does each car run?
The Volvo XC60 3.2 243 trips the lights at 83.3 mph and the Mercedes-AMG GLC 43 X253 367 PS at 104.2 mph at the end of the quarter mile. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
Are these real measured times?
No. Every time on this page is produced by a physics simulation, not by a stopwatch at a drag strip. Each car is modelled from its published kerb mass, rated power, drivetrain and gearing, then trimmed until it matches its own published acceleration figures — 2 of 2 for the Volvo XC60 3.2 243 and 9 of 10 for the Mercedes-AMG GLC 43 X253 367 PS. Conditions are identical for both cars: dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.

Figures regenerated 2026-10-12. Every number on this page is computed by the simulator at build time, so the page and the app can never disagree.