← My Auto Racer All cars Ford 0-60 Comparisons Answers

Ford Mondeo Hatchback 2.0 145

The Ford Mondeo Hatchback 2.0 145 reaches 60 mph in 8.54 s (100 km/h in 9.53 s) and covers a standing quarter mile in 16.84 s, tripping the lights at 84.7 mph. It clears the first 60 ft in 2.91 s and the eighth mile in 11.03 s.

Simulated, not measured — computed from published kerb mass, rated power, gearing and drivetrain, then fitted to this car’s own published acceleration figures. Dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.

Ford Mondeo Hatchback 2.0 145 Toyota Auris 5dr 1.6 Valvematic 132 (2013)

Pick who it runs against, then watch it happen — and change the surface, the weather or the distance and run it again.

Down the strip

Standing start Ford Mondeo Hatchback 2.0 145
0–60 mph8.54 s
0–100 km/h9.53 s
0–100 mph—
60 ft2.91 s
1/8 mile11.03 s
1/4 mile16.84 s
Trap speed84.7 mph

About the Mondeo Hatchback 2.0 145

The 2010 Ford Mondeo Hatchback 2.0 145 is a front-drive naturally aspirated car of 1,402 kg with 143 bhp, which works out at 102 bhp per tonne. Front drive caps what it can put down off the line — 60 ft takes 2.91 s — so most of what it has to give arrives once it is already moving. Against the 14,946 cars in the set it is the 7,560th quickest to 60 mph, and the 262nd quickest of the 789 Fords here. Its 84.7 mph trap speed sits about where its 0-60 puts it, so it launches and pulls in roughly equal measure. The simulation is trimmed to 2 of 2 published acceleration figures for this car.

On paper

Specification Ford Mondeo Hatchback 2.0 145
Year2010
Power143 hp (107 kW)
Kerb mass1,402 kg
Power to weight102 bhp/t
DrivetrainFront drive
Gears5
EngineNaturally aspirated
Top speed130 mph (209 km/h), quoted

Similar cars

CarYear 0–601/4 mileTrapPower
Toyota Auris 5dr 1.6 Valvematic 132 (2013)20138.61 s16.77 s83.1 mph130 bhp
VW Jetta 2.0TDI DSG Mk VI20118.57 s16.67 s86.2 mph138 bhp
Alfa Romeo MiTo 1.6 JTDm 12020088.51 s16.65 s82.6 mph118 bhp

Picked for a fair race, not just a matching 0-60: pace, power-to-weight and body shape all count, and at most one is from the same maker.

Where these times sit

0-60 under 10 seconds10,136 cars0-100 km/h under 10 seconds9,062 carsSlower in the wetevery car, re-runThe cost of altitudeevery car, re-runThe cost of a passengerevery car, re-run
Ford 0-60 timesevery modelFastest hatchbacks4,513 carsFastest cars of the 2010s4,541 cars
Put this race on your own page

Free to use anywhere, no attribution required beyond the credit line included above. How to embed →

Questions

What is the Ford Mondeo Hatchback 2.0 145 0-60 time?
The Ford Mondeo Hatchback 2.0 145 reaches 60 mph in 8.54 s, simulated on dry asphalt at 20 °C with a 1 ft rollout. That makes it the 7,560th quickest of the 14,946 cars in the set.
What is the Ford Mondeo Hatchback 2.0 145 quarter mile time?
16.84 s at 84.7 mph. It reaches the eighth mile in 11.03 s and clears the first 60 ft in 2.91 s. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
How much power does the Ford Mondeo Hatchback 2.0 145 have?
143 bhp and 1,402 kg, which is 102 bhp per tonne. It is front-drive, naturally aspirated, with 5 gears and a quoted top speed of 209 km/h. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
What cars are comparable to the Ford Mondeo Hatchback 2.0 145?
Closest here on pace: Toyota Auris 5dr 1.6 Valvematic 132 (2013) (8.61 s), VW Jetta 2.0TDI DSG Mk VI (8.57 s), Alfa Romeo MiTo 1.6 JTDm 120 (8.51 s). Each one can be raced against the Ford Mondeo Hatchback 2.0 145 in the panel at the top of this page. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
Are these real measured times?
No. Every figure on this page is produced by a physics simulation, not by a stopwatch at a drag strip. The Ford Mondeo Hatchback 2.0 145 is modelled from its published kerb mass, rated power, drivetrain and gearing, then trimmed until it reproduces 2 of its 2 published acceleration figures. Conditions are the same for every car in the set: dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.

Figures regenerated 2026-10-12. Every number on this page is computed by the simulator at build time, so the page and the app can never disagree.