← My Auto Racer All cars Comparisons Answers 0-60 by make Fastest lists

Honda CR-V 2.0 i-VTEC 155 (2016) vs Volvo XC40 D3 150

Over a standing quarter mile on dry asphalt the Volvo XC40 D3 150 is the quicker car, covering it in 16.68 s at 83.4 mph against the Honda CR-V 2.0 i-VTEC 155 (2016)’s 18.43 s — a margin of 1.76 s. To 60 mph the Volvo XC40 D3 150 takes 8.52 s and the Honda CR-V 2.0 i-VTEC 155 (2016) 11.18 s.

Simulated, not measured — computed from each car’s published kerb mass, rated power and drivetrain, then fitted to its own published acceleration figures. Dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.

Honda CR-V 2.0 i-VTEC 155 (2016) Volvo XC40 D3 150

Watch the run in full — then change the surface, the weather or the distance and run it again.

Down the strip

Standing startHonda CR-V 2.0 i-VTEC 155 (2016)Volvo XC40 D3 150
0–60 mph11.18 s8.52 s
0–100 mph——
60 ft3.23 s2.58 s
1/8 mile12.06 s10.79 s
1/4 mile18.43 s16.68 s
Trap speed77.4 mph83.4 mph

Each car is trimmed to its own published figures — 2/2 for the Honda CR-V 2.0 i-VTEC 155 (2016), 2/2 for the Volvo XC40 D3 150 — so a heavier car can still be the quicker one if that is what it tests.

On paper

SpecificationHonda CR-V 2.0 i-VTEC 155 (2016)Volvo XC40 D3 150
Year20162018
Power153 bhp148 bhp
Kerb mass1,543 kg1,575 kg
Power to weight99 bhp/t94 bhp/t
DrivetrainAll-wheel driveFront drive
EngineNaturally aspiratedTurbodiesel

Where these times sit

0-60 under 10 seconds10,147 cars0-100 km/h under 10 seconds9,071 carsSlower in the wetevery car, re-runThe cost of altitudeevery car, re-runThe cost of a passengerevery car, re-run
Honda 0-60 timesevery modelVolvo 0-60 timesevery modelFastest SUVs2,062 carsFastest cars of the 2010s4,546 cars

Try another matchup

Put this race on your own page

Free to use anywhere, no attribution required beyond the credit line included above. How to embed →

Or open the full simulator →

Questions

Is the Honda CR-V 2.0 i-VTEC 155 (2016) or the Volvo XC40 D3 150 faster?
The Volvo XC40 D3 150. Over a standing quarter mile it runs 16.68 s to the Honda CR-V 2.0 i-VTEC 155 (2016)'s 18.43 s, a margin of 1.76 s, and it reaches 60 mph in 8.52 s against 11.18 s. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
What is the Honda CR-V 2.0 i-VTEC 155 (2016) 0-60 time?
The Honda CR-V 2.0 i-VTEC 155 (2016) reaches 60 mph in 11.18 s, simulated on dry asphalt at 20 °C with a 1 ft rollout. It covers the standing quarter mile in 18.43 s at 77.4 mph.
What is the Volvo XC40 D3 150 0-60 time?
The Volvo XC40 D3 150 reaches 60 mph in 8.52 s, simulated on dry asphalt at 20 °C with a 1 ft rollout. It covers the standing quarter mile in 16.68 s at 83.4 mph.
What trap speed does each car run?
The Honda CR-V 2.0 i-VTEC 155 (2016) trips the lights at 77.4 mph and the Volvo XC40 D3 150 at 83.4 mph at the end of the quarter mile. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
Are these real measured times?
No. Every time on this page is produced by a physics simulation, not by a stopwatch at a drag strip. Each car is modelled from its published kerb mass, rated power, drivetrain and gearing, then trimmed until it matches its own published acceleration figures — 2 of 2 for the Honda CR-V 2.0 i-VTEC 155 (2016) and 2 of 2 for the Volvo XC40 D3 150. Conditions are identical for both cars: dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.

Figures regenerated 2026-10-12. Every number on this page is computed by the simulator at build time, so the page and the app can never disagree.