Over a standing quarter mile on dry asphalt the Volvo XC60 2.0 D4 190 is the quicker car,
covering it in 15.80 s at
84.6 mph against the Skoda Karoq 1.5 TSI 150’s
16.02 s — a margin of
0.22 s. To 60 mph the Volvo XC60 2.0 D4 190 takes
7.49 s and the Skoda Karoq 1.5 TSI 150
7.61 s.
Simulated, not measured — computed from each car’s published kerb mass,
rated power and drivetrain, then fitted to its own published acceleration figures.
Dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.
Skoda Karoq 1.5 TSI 150Volvo XC60 2.0 D4 190
Watch the run in full — then change the surface, the weather
or the distance and run it again.
Down the strip
Standing start
Skoda Karoq 1.5 TSI 150
Volvo XC60 2.0 D4 190
0–60 mph
7.61 s
7.49 s
0–100 mph
—
—
60 ft
2.54 s
2.19 s
1/8 mile
10.44 s
10.00 s
1/4 mile
16.02 s
15.80 s
Trap speed
88.5 mph
84.6 mph
Each car is trimmed to its own published figures —
2/2 for the Skoda Karoq 1.5 TSI 150,
2/2 for the Volvo XC60 2.0 D4 190 —
so a heavier car can still be the quicker one if that is what it tests.
Is the Skoda Karoq 1.5 TSI 150 or the Volvo XC60 2.0 D4 190 faster?
The Volvo XC60 2.0 D4 190. Over a standing quarter mile it runs 15.80 s to the Skoda Karoq 1.5 TSI 150's 16.02 s, a margin of 0.22 s, and it reaches 60 mph in 7.49 s against 7.61 s. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
What is the Skoda Karoq 1.5 TSI 150 0-60 time?
The Skoda Karoq 1.5 TSI 150 reaches 60 mph in 7.61 s, simulated on dry asphalt at 20 °C with a 1 ft rollout. It covers the standing quarter mile in 16.02 s at 88.5 mph.
What is the Volvo XC60 2.0 D4 190 0-60 time?
The Volvo XC60 2.0 D4 190 reaches 60 mph in 7.49 s, simulated on dry asphalt at 20 °C with a 1 ft rollout. It covers the standing quarter mile in 15.80 s at 84.6 mph.
What trap speed does each car run?
The Skoda Karoq 1.5 TSI 150 trips the lights at 88.5 mph and the Volvo XC60 2.0 D4 190 at 84.6 mph at the end of the quarter mile. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
Are these real measured times?
No. Every time on this page is produced by a physics simulation, not by a stopwatch at a drag strip. Each car is modelled from its published kerb mass, rated power, drivetrain and gearing, then trimmed until it matches its own published acceleration figures — 2 of 2 for the Skoda Karoq 1.5 TSI 150 and 2 of 2 for the Volvo XC60 2.0 D4 190. Conditions are identical for both cars: dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.
Figures regenerated 2026-10-12. Every number on this page is computed by the simulator at build time, so the page and the app can never disagree.