← My Auto Racer All cars Comparisons Answers 0-60 by make Fastest lists

Volvo XC60 2.0 D4 190 vs Ford Kuga 2.0 TDCi 180

Over a standing quarter mile on dry asphalt the Volvo XC60 2.0 D4 190 is the quicker car, covering it in 15.80 s at 84.6 mph against the Ford Kuga 2.0 TDCi 180’s 16.72 s — a margin of 0.92 s. To 60 mph the Volvo XC60 2.0 D4 190 takes 7.49 s and the Ford Kuga 2.0 TDCi 180 8.76 s.

Simulated, not measured — computed from each car’s published kerb mass, rated power and drivetrain, then fitted to its own published acceleration figures. Dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.

Volvo XC60 2.0 D4 190 Ford Kuga 2.0 TDCi 180

Watch the run in full — then change the surface, the weather or the distance and run it again.

Down the strip

Standing startVolvo XC60 2.0 D4 190Ford Kuga 2.0 TDCi 180
0–60 mph7.49 s8.76 s
0–100 mph——
60 ft2.19 s2.49 s
1/8 mile10.00 s10.66 s
1/4 mile15.80 s16.72 s
Trap speed84.6 mph81.1 mph

Each car is trimmed to its own published figures — 2/2 for the Volvo XC60 2.0 D4 190, 2/2 for the Ford Kuga 2.0 TDCi 180 — so a heavier car can still be the quicker one if that is what it tests.

On paper

SpecificationVolvo XC60 2.0 D4 190Ford Kuga 2.0 TDCi 180
Year20172020
Power188 bhp177 bhp
Kerb mass1,910 kg1,716 kg
Power to weight98 bhp/t103 bhp/t
DrivetrainAll-wheel driveAll-wheel drive
EngineTurbodieselTurbodiesel

Where these times sit

0-60 under 8 seconds6,521 cars0-100 km/h under 10 seconds9,071 carsSlower in the wetevery car, re-runThe cost of altitudeevery car, re-runThe cost of a passengerevery car, re-run
Volvo 0-60 timesevery modelFord 0-60 timesevery modelFastest SUVs2,062 cars

Try another matchup

Put this race on your own page

Free to use anywhere, no attribution required beyond the credit line included above. How to embed →

Or open the full simulator →

Questions

Is the Volvo XC60 2.0 D4 190 or the Ford Kuga 2.0 TDCi 180 faster?
The Volvo XC60 2.0 D4 190. Over a standing quarter mile it runs 15.80 s to the Ford Kuga 2.0 TDCi 180's 16.72 s, a margin of 0.92 s, and it reaches 60 mph in 7.49 s against 8.76 s. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
What is the Volvo XC60 2.0 D4 190 0-60 time?
The Volvo XC60 2.0 D4 190 reaches 60 mph in 7.49 s, simulated on dry asphalt at 20 °C with a 1 ft rollout. It covers the standing quarter mile in 15.80 s at 84.6 mph.
What is the Ford Kuga 2.0 TDCi 180 0-60 time?
The Ford Kuga 2.0 TDCi 180 reaches 60 mph in 8.76 s, simulated on dry asphalt at 20 °C with a 1 ft rollout. It covers the standing quarter mile in 16.72 s at 81.1 mph.
What trap speed does each car run?
The Volvo XC60 2.0 D4 190 trips the lights at 84.6 mph and the Ford Kuga 2.0 TDCi 180 at 81.1 mph at the end of the quarter mile. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
Are these real measured times?
No. Every time on this page is produced by a physics simulation, not by a stopwatch at a drag strip. Each car is modelled from its published kerb mass, rated power, drivetrain and gearing, then trimmed until it matches its own published acceleration figures — 2 of 2 for the Volvo XC60 2.0 D4 190 and 2 of 2 for the Ford Kuga 2.0 TDCi 180. Conditions are identical for both cars: dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.

Figures regenerated 2026-10-12. Every number on this page is computed by the simulator at build time, so the page and the app can never disagree.