← My Auto Racer All cars Comparisons Answers 0-60 by make Fastest lists

Alpine A110 Mk II vs Lotus Evora 400

Over a standing quarter mile on dry asphalt the Lotus Evora 400 is the quicker car, covering it in 12.33 s at 115.0 mph against the Alpine A110 Mk II’s 12.52 s — a margin of 0.19 s. To 60 mph the Lotus Evora 400 takes 3.96 s and the Alpine A110 Mk II 3.96 s.

Simulated, not measured — computed from each car’s published kerb mass, rated power and drivetrain, then fitted to its own published acceleration figures. Dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.

Alpine A110 Mk II Lotus Evora 400

Watch the run in full — then change the surface, the weather or the distance and run it again.

Down the strip

Standing startAlpine A110 Mk IILotus Evora 400
0–60 mph3.96 s3.96 s
0–100 mph9.95 s9.36 s
60 ft1.96 s2.00 s
1/8 mile8.06 s8.01 s
1/4 mile12.52 s12.33 s
Trap speed110.5 mph115.0 mph

Each car is trimmed to its own published figures — 9/10 for the Alpine A110 Mk II, 9/10 for the Lotus Evora 400 — so a heavier car can still be the quicker one if that is what it tests.

On paper

SpecificationAlpine A110 Mk IILotus Evora 400
Year20172016
Power248 bhp400 bhp
Kerb mass1,080 kg1,415 kg
Power to weight230 bhp/t282 bhp/t
DrivetrainRear driveRear drive
EngineTurbochargedNaturally aspirated

Where these times sit

0-60 under 4 seconds1,060 cars0-100 km/h under 5 seconds1,846 carsQuarter mile under 13 seconds1,639 cars0-100 under 12 seconds1,964 carsTraps over 110 mph1,380 carsSlower in the wetevery car, re-runThe cost of altitudeevery car, re-runThe cost of a passengerevery car, re-run
Alpine 0-60 timesevery modelLotus 0-60 timesevery modelFastest hatchbacks4,527 carsFastest cars of the 2010s4,546 cars

Try another matchup

Put this race on your own page

Free to use anywhere, no attribution required beyond the credit line included above. How to embed →

Or open the full simulator →

Questions

Is the Alpine A110 Mk II or the Lotus Evora 400 faster?
The Lotus Evora 400. Over a standing quarter mile it runs 12.33 s to the Alpine A110 Mk II's 12.52 s, a margin of 0.19 s, and it reaches 60 mph in 3.96 s against 3.96 s. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
What is the Alpine A110 Mk II 0-60 time?
The Alpine A110 Mk II reaches 60 mph in 3.96 s, simulated on dry asphalt at 20 °C with a 1 ft rollout. It covers the standing quarter mile in 12.52 s at 110.5 mph.
What is the Lotus Evora 400 0-60 time?
The Lotus Evora 400 reaches 60 mph in 3.96 s, simulated on dry asphalt at 20 °C with a 1 ft rollout. It covers the standing quarter mile in 12.33 s at 115.0 mph.
What trap speed does each car run?
The Alpine A110 Mk II trips the lights at 110.5 mph and the Lotus Evora 400 at 115.0 mph at the end of the quarter mile. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
Are these real measured times?
No. Every time on this page is produced by a physics simulation, not by a stopwatch at a drag strip. Each car is modelled from its published kerb mass, rated power, drivetrain and gearing, then trimmed until it matches its own published acceleration figures — 9 of 10 for the Alpine A110 Mk II and 9 of 10 for the Lotus Evora 400. Conditions are identical for both cars: dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.

Figures regenerated 2026-10-12. Every number on this page is computed by the simulator at build time, so the page and the app can never disagree.