← My Auto Racer All cars Comparisons Answers 0-60 by make Fastest lists

Ford Puma ST Mk II vs Suzuki S-Cross 1.4 Boosterjet 129

Over a standing quarter mile on dry asphalt the Ford Puma ST Mk II is the quicker car, covering it in 14.60 s at 94.2 mph against the Suzuki S-Cross 1.4 Boosterjet 129’s 16.85 s — a margin of 2.25 s. To 60 mph the Ford Puma ST Mk II takes 5.94 s and the Suzuki S-Cross 1.4 Boosterjet 129 9.18 s.

Simulated, not measured — computed from each car’s published kerb mass, rated power and drivetrain, then fitted to its own published acceleration figures. Dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.

Ford Puma ST Mk II Suzuki S-Cross 1.4 Boosterjet 129

Watch the run in full — then change the surface, the weather or the distance and run it again.

Down the strip

Standing startFord Puma ST Mk IISuzuki S-Cross 1.4 Boosterjet 129
0–60 mph5.94 s9.18 s
0–100 mph——
60 ft2.25 s2.49 s
1/8 mile9.38 s10.73 s
1/4 mile14.60 s16.85 s
Trap speed94.2 mph80.2 mph

Each car is trimmed to its own published figures — 9/10 for the Ford Puma ST Mk II, 2/2 for the Suzuki S-Cross 1.4 Boosterjet 129 — so a heavier car can still be the quicker one if that is what it tests.

On paper

SpecificationFord Puma ST Mk IISuzuki S-Cross 1.4 Boosterjet 129
Year20202022
Power197 bhp127 bhp
Kerb mass1,358 kg1,255 kg
Power to weight145 bhp/t102 bhp/t
DrivetrainFront driveAll-wheel drive
EngineTurbochargedTurbocharged

Where these times sit

0-60 under 6 seconds3,252 cars0-100 km/h under 7 seconds4,035 carsSlower in the wetevery car, re-runThe cost of altitudeevery car, re-runThe cost of a passengerevery car, re-run
Ford 0-60 timesevery modelSuzuki 0-60 timesevery modelFastest hatchbacks4,527 carsFastest cars of the 2020s868 cars

Try another matchup

Put this race on your own page

Free to use anywhere, no attribution required beyond the credit line included above. How to embed →

Or open the full simulator →

Questions

Is the Ford Puma ST Mk II or the Suzuki S-Cross 1.4 Boosterjet 129 faster?
The Ford Puma ST Mk II. Over a standing quarter mile it runs 14.60 s to the Suzuki S-Cross 1.4 Boosterjet 129's 16.85 s, a margin of 2.25 s, and it reaches 60 mph in 5.94 s against 9.18 s. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
What is the Ford Puma ST Mk II 0-60 time?
The Ford Puma ST Mk II reaches 60 mph in 5.94 s, simulated on dry asphalt at 20 °C with a 1 ft rollout. It covers the standing quarter mile in 14.60 s at 94.2 mph.
What is the Suzuki S-Cross 1.4 Boosterjet 129 0-60 time?
The Suzuki S-Cross 1.4 Boosterjet 129 reaches 60 mph in 9.18 s, simulated on dry asphalt at 20 °C with a 1 ft rollout. It covers the standing quarter mile in 16.85 s at 80.2 mph.
What trap speed does each car run?
The Ford Puma ST Mk II trips the lights at 94.2 mph and the Suzuki S-Cross 1.4 Boosterjet 129 at 80.2 mph at the end of the quarter mile. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
Are these real measured times?
No. Every time on this page is produced by a physics simulation, not by a stopwatch at a drag strip. Each car is modelled from its published kerb mass, rated power, drivetrain and gearing, then trimmed until it matches its own published acceleration figures — 9 of 10 for the Ford Puma ST Mk II and 2 of 2 for the Suzuki S-Cross 1.4 Boosterjet 129. Conditions are identical for both cars: dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.

Figures regenerated 2026-10-12. Every number on this page is computed by the simulator at build time, so the page and the app can never disagree.