← My Auto Racer All cars Comparisons Answers 0-60 by make Fastest lists

Mercedes-Benz C Class C 160 129 vs Mercedes-Benz GLC (X253) 200 4MATIC 197

Over a standing quarter mile on dry asphalt the Mercedes-Benz GLC (X253) 200 4MATIC 197 is the quicker car, covering it in 15.45 s at 87.5 mph against the Mercedes-Benz C Class C 160 129’s 16.76 s — a margin of 1.31 s. To 60 mph the Mercedes-Benz GLC (X253) 200 4MATIC 197 takes 7.06 s and the Mercedes-Benz C Class C 160 129 8.84 s.

Simulated, not measured — computed from each car’s published kerb mass, rated power and drivetrain, then fitted to its own published acceleration figures. Dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.

Mercedes-Benz C Class C 160 129 Mercedes-Benz GLC (X253) 200 4MATIC 197

Watch the run in full — then change the surface, the weather or the distance and run it again.

Down the strip

Standing startMercedes-Benz C Class C 160 129Mercedes-Benz GLC (X253) 200 4MATIC 197
0–60 mph8.84 s7.06 s
0–100 mph——
60 ft2.59 s2.16 s
1/8 mile10.77 s9.79 s
1/4 mile16.76 s15.45 s
Trap speed83.1 mph87.5 mph

Each car is trimmed to its own published figures — 2/2 for the Mercedes-Benz C Class C 160 129, 2/2 for the Mercedes-Benz GLC (X253) 200 4MATIC 197 — so a heavier car can still be the quicker one if that is what it tests.

On paper

SpecificationMercedes-Benz C Class C 160 129Mercedes-Benz GLC (X253) 200 4MATIC 197
Year20182019
Power127 bhp194 bhp
Kerb mass1,419 kg1,725 kg
Power to weight90 bhp/t113 bhp/t
DrivetrainRear driveAll-wheel drive
EngineNaturally aspiratedTurbocharged

Where these times sit

0-60 under 8 seconds6,521 cars0-100 km/h under 8 seconds5,609 carsSlower in the wetevery car, re-runThe cost of altitudeevery car, re-runThe cost of a passengerevery car, re-run
Mercedes-Benz 0-60 timesevery modelFastest cars of the 2010s4,546 cars

Try another matchup

Put this race on your own page

Free to use anywhere, no attribution required beyond the credit line included above. How to embed →

Or open the full simulator →

Questions

Is the Mercedes-Benz C Class C 160 129 or the Mercedes-Benz GLC (X253) 200 4MATIC 197 faster?
The Mercedes-Benz GLC (X253) 200 4MATIC 197. Over a standing quarter mile it runs 15.45 s to the Mercedes-Benz C Class C 160 129's 16.76 s, a margin of 1.31 s, and it reaches 60 mph in 7.06 s against 8.84 s. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
What is the Mercedes-Benz C Class C 160 129 0-60 time?
The Mercedes-Benz C Class C 160 129 reaches 60 mph in 8.84 s, simulated on dry asphalt at 20 °C with a 1 ft rollout. It covers the standing quarter mile in 16.76 s at 83.1 mph.
What is the Mercedes-Benz GLC (X253) 200 4MATIC 197 0-60 time?
The Mercedes-Benz GLC (X253) 200 4MATIC 197 reaches 60 mph in 7.06 s, simulated on dry asphalt at 20 °C with a 1 ft rollout. It covers the standing quarter mile in 15.45 s at 87.5 mph.
What trap speed does each car run?
The Mercedes-Benz C Class C 160 129 trips the lights at 83.1 mph and the Mercedes-Benz GLC (X253) 200 4MATIC 197 at 87.5 mph at the end of the quarter mile. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
Are these real measured times?
No. Every time on this page is produced by a physics simulation, not by a stopwatch at a drag strip. Each car is modelled from its published kerb mass, rated power, drivetrain and gearing, then trimmed until it matches its own published acceleration figures — 2 of 2 for the Mercedes-Benz C Class C 160 129 and 2 of 2 for the Mercedes-Benz GLC (X253) 200 4MATIC 197. Conditions are identical for both cars: dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.

Figures regenerated 2026-10-12. Every number on this page is computed by the simulator at build time, so the page and the app can never disagree.