← My Auto Racer All cars Comparisons Answers 0-60 by make Fastest lists

Mercedes-Benz C Class C 160 129 vs Toyota GR Corolla

Over a standing quarter mile on dry asphalt the Toyota GR Corolla is the quicker car, covering it in 13.39 s at 105.2 mph against the Mercedes-Benz C Class C 160 129’s 16.76 s — a margin of 3.36 s. To 60 mph the Toyota GR Corolla takes 4.85 s and the Mercedes-Benz C Class C 160 129 8.84 s.

Simulated, not measured — computed from each car’s published kerb mass, rated power and drivetrain, then fitted to its own published acceleration figures. Dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.

Mercedes-Benz C Class C 160 129 Toyota GR Corolla

Watch the run in full — then change the surface, the weather or the distance and run it again.

Down the strip

Standing startMercedes-Benz C Class C 160 129Toyota GR Corolla
0–60 mph8.84 s4.85 s
0–100 mph—12.04 s
60 ft2.59 s2.16 s
1/8 mile10.77 s8.70 s
1/4 mile16.76 s13.39 s
Trap speed83.1 mph105.2 mph

Each car is trimmed to its own published figures — 2/2 for the Mercedes-Benz C Class C 160 129, 9/10 for the Toyota GR Corolla — so a heavier car can still be the quicker one if that is what it tests.

On paper

SpecificationMercedes-Benz C Class C 160 129Toyota GR Corolla
Year20182022
Power127 bhp300 bhp
Kerb mass1,419 kg1,474 kg
Power to weight90 bhp/t204 bhp/t
DrivetrainRear driveAll-wheel drive
EngineNaturally aspiratedTurbocharged

Where these times sit

0-60 under 5 seconds2,159 cars0-100 km/h under 6 seconds2,897 carsQuarter mile under 14 seconds2,646 cars0-100 under 16 seconds2,743 carsSlower in the wetevery car, re-runThe cost of altitudeevery car, re-runThe cost of a passengerevery car, re-run
Mercedes-Benz 0-60 timesevery modelToyota 0-60 timesevery model

Try another matchup

Put this race on your own page

Free to use anywhere, no attribution required beyond the credit line included above. How to embed →

Or open the full simulator →

Questions

Is the Mercedes-Benz C Class C 160 129 or the Toyota GR Corolla faster?
The Toyota GR Corolla. Over a standing quarter mile it runs 13.39 s to the Mercedes-Benz C Class C 160 129's 16.76 s, a margin of 3.36 s, and it reaches 60 mph in 4.85 s against 8.84 s. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
What is the Mercedes-Benz C Class C 160 129 0-60 time?
The Mercedes-Benz C Class C 160 129 reaches 60 mph in 8.84 s, simulated on dry asphalt at 20 °C with a 1 ft rollout. It covers the standing quarter mile in 16.76 s at 83.1 mph.
What is the Toyota GR Corolla 0-60 time?
The Toyota GR Corolla reaches 60 mph in 4.85 s, simulated on dry asphalt at 20 °C with a 1 ft rollout. It covers the standing quarter mile in 13.39 s at 105.2 mph.
What trap speed does each car run?
The Mercedes-Benz C Class C 160 129 trips the lights at 83.1 mph and the Toyota GR Corolla at 105.2 mph at the end of the quarter mile. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
Are these real measured times?
No. Every time on this page is produced by a physics simulation, not by a stopwatch at a drag strip. Each car is modelled from its published kerb mass, rated power, drivetrain and gearing, then trimmed until it matches its own published acceleration figures — 2 of 2 for the Mercedes-Benz C Class C 160 129 and 9 of 10 for the Toyota GR Corolla. Conditions are identical for both cars: dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.

Figures regenerated 2026-10-12. Every number on this page is computed by the simulator at build time, so the page and the app can never disagree.