← My Auto Racer All cars Comparisons Answers 0-60 by make Fastest lists

Volvo XC60 2.0 D4 190 vs Polestar 4 Dual Motor Performance

Over a standing quarter mile on dry asphalt the Polestar 4 Dual Motor Performance is the quicker car, covering it in 12.12 s at 114.9 mph against the Volvo XC60 2.0 D4 190’s 15.80 s — a margin of 3.68 s. To 60 mph the Polestar 4 Dual Motor Performance takes 3.66 s and the Volvo XC60 2.0 D4 190 7.49 s.

Simulated, not measured — computed from each car’s published kerb mass, rated power and drivetrain, then fitted to its own published acceleration figures. Dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.

Volvo XC60 2.0 D4 190 Polestar 4 Dual Motor Performance

Watch the run in full — then change the surface, the weather or the distance and run it again.

Down the strip

Standing startVolvo XC60 2.0 D4 190Polestar 4 Dual Motor Performance
0–60 mph7.49 s3.66 s
0–100 mph—9.06 s
60 ft2.19 s1.92 s
1/8 mile10.00 s7.81 s
1/4 mile15.80 s12.12 s
Trap speed84.6 mph114.9 mph

Each car is trimmed to its own published figures — 2/2 for the Volvo XC60 2.0 D4 190, 10/10 for the Polestar 4 Dual Motor Performance — so a heavier car can still be the quicker one if that is what it tests.

On paper

SpecificationVolvo XC60 2.0 D4 190Polestar 4 Dual Motor Performance
Year20172024
Power188 bhp536 bhp
Kerb mass1,910 kg1,950 kg
Power to weight98 bhp/t275 bhp/t
DrivetrainAll-wheel driveAll-wheel drive
EngineTurbodieselElectric

Where these times sit

0-60 under 4 seconds1,060 cars0-100 km/h under 4 seconds881 carsQuarter mile under 13 seconds1,639 cars0-100 under 12 seconds1,964 carsSlower in the wetevery car, re-runThe cost of altitudeevery car, re-runThe cost of a passengerevery car, re-run
Volvo 0-60 timesevery modelFastest 4x4s and all-wheel-drive cars2,989 cars

Try another matchup

Put this race on your own page

Free to use anywhere, no attribution required beyond the credit line included above. How to embed →

Or open the full simulator →

Questions

Is the Volvo XC60 2.0 D4 190 or the Polestar 4 Dual Motor Performance faster?
The Polestar 4 Dual Motor Performance. Over a standing quarter mile it runs 12.12 s to the Volvo XC60 2.0 D4 190's 15.80 s, a margin of 3.68 s, and it reaches 60 mph in 3.66 s against 7.49 s. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
What is the Volvo XC60 2.0 D4 190 0-60 time?
The Volvo XC60 2.0 D4 190 reaches 60 mph in 7.49 s, simulated on dry asphalt at 20 °C with a 1 ft rollout. It covers the standing quarter mile in 15.80 s at 84.6 mph.
What is the Polestar 4 Dual Motor Performance 0-60 time?
The Polestar 4 Dual Motor Performance reaches 60 mph in 3.66 s, simulated on dry asphalt at 20 °C with a 1 ft rollout. It covers the standing quarter mile in 12.12 s at 114.9 mph.
What trap speed does each car run?
The Volvo XC60 2.0 D4 190 trips the lights at 84.6 mph and the Polestar 4 Dual Motor Performance at 114.9 mph at the end of the quarter mile. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
Are these real measured times?
No. Every time on this page is produced by a physics simulation, not by a stopwatch at a drag strip. Each car is modelled from its published kerb mass, rated power, drivetrain and gearing, then trimmed until it matches its own published acceleration figures — 2 of 2 for the Volvo XC60 2.0 D4 190 and 10 of 10 for the Polestar 4 Dual Motor Performance. Conditions are identical for both cars: dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.

Figures regenerated 2026-10-12. Every number on this page is computed by the simulator at build time, so the page and the app can never disagree.