Honda Jazz/Fit 1.5 130 vs Suzuki Swift 1.2 Dualjet
Over a standing quarter mile on dry asphalt the Honda Jazz/Fit 1.5 130 is the quicker car,
covering it in 17.98 s at
76.9 mph against the Suzuki Swift 1.2 Dualjet’s
18.16 s — a margin of
0.18 s. To 60 mph the Honda Jazz/Fit 1.5 130 takes
10.91 s and the Suzuki Swift 1.2 Dualjet
10.85 s.
Simulated, not measured — computed from each car’s published kerb mass,
rated power and drivetrain, then fitted to its own published acceleration figures.
Dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.
Honda Jazz/Fit 1.5 130Suzuki Swift 1.2 Dualjet
Watch the run in full — then change the surface, the weather
or the distance and run it again.
Down the strip
Standing start
Honda Jazz/Fit 1.5 130
Suzuki Swift 1.2 Dualjet
0–60 mph
10.91 s
10.85 s
0–100 mph
—
—
60 ft
2.81 s
3.09 s
1/8 mile
11.59 s
11.82 s
1/4 mile
17.98 s
18.16 s
Trap speed
76.9 mph
77.7 mph
Each car is trimmed to its own published figures —
2/2 for the Honda Jazz/Fit 1.5 130,
2/2 for the Suzuki Swift 1.2 Dualjet —
so a heavier car can still be the quicker one if that is what it tests.
Is the Honda Jazz/Fit 1.5 130 or the Suzuki Swift 1.2 Dualjet faster?
The Honda Jazz/Fit 1.5 130. Over a standing quarter mile it runs 17.98 s to the Suzuki Swift 1.2 Dualjet's 18.16 s, a margin of 0.18 s, and it reaches 60 mph in 10.91 s against 10.85 s. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
What is the Honda Jazz/Fit 1.5 130 0-60 time?
The Honda Jazz/Fit 1.5 130 reaches 60 mph in 10.91 s, simulated on dry asphalt at 20 °C with a 1 ft rollout. It covers the standing quarter mile in 17.98 s at 76.9 mph.
What is the Suzuki Swift 1.2 Dualjet 0-60 time?
The Suzuki Swift 1.2 Dualjet reaches 60 mph in 10.85 s, simulated on dry asphalt at 20 °C with a 1 ft rollout. It covers the standing quarter mile in 18.16 s at 77.7 mph.
What trap speed does each car run?
The Honda Jazz/Fit 1.5 130 trips the lights at 76.9 mph and the Suzuki Swift 1.2 Dualjet at 77.7 mph at the end of the quarter mile. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
Are these real measured times?
No. Every time on this page is produced by a physics simulation, not by a stopwatch at a drag strip. Each car is modelled from its published kerb mass, rated power, drivetrain and gearing, then trimmed until it matches its own published acceleration figures — 2 of 2 for the Honda Jazz/Fit 1.5 130 and 2 of 2 for the Suzuki Swift 1.2 Dualjet. Conditions are identical for both cars: dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.
Figures regenerated 2026-10-12. Every number on this page is computed by the simulator at build time, so the page and the app can never disagree.