← My Auto Racer All cars Comparisons Answers 0-60 by make Fastest lists

Suzuki Swift 1.2 Dualjet vs Volkswagen Polo 1.0 TSI 95

Over a standing quarter mile on dry asphalt the Volkswagen Polo 1.0 TSI 95 is the quicker car, covering it in 17.45 s at 78.8 mph against the Suzuki Swift 1.2 Dualjet’s 18.16 s — a margin of 0.71 s. To 60 mph the Volkswagen Polo 1.0 TSI 95 takes 9.92 s and the Suzuki Swift 1.2 Dualjet 10.85 s.

Simulated, not measured — computed from each car’s published kerb mass, rated power and drivetrain, then fitted to its own published acceleration figures. Dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.

Suzuki Swift 1.2 Dualjet Volkswagen Polo 1.0 TSI 95

Watch the run in full — then change the surface, the weather or the distance and run it again.

Down the strip

Standing startSuzuki Swift 1.2 DualjetVolkswagen Polo 1.0 TSI 95
0–60 mph10.85 s9.92 s
0–100 mph——
60 ft3.09 s2.77 s
1/8 mile11.82 s11.21 s
1/4 mile18.16 s17.45 s
Trap speed77.7 mph78.8 mph

Each car is trimmed to its own published figures — 2/2 for the Suzuki Swift 1.2 Dualjet, 2/2 for the Volkswagen Polo 1.0 TSI 95 — so a heavier car can still be the quicker one if that is what it tests.

On paper

SpecificationSuzuki Swift 1.2 DualjetVolkswagen Polo 1.0 TSI 95
Year20172022
Power89 bhp94 bhp
Kerb mass890 kg1,165 kg
Power to weight99 bhp/t81 bhp/t
DrivetrainFront driveFront drive
EngineNaturally aspiratedTurbocharged

Where these times sit

0-60 under 10 seconds10,147 carsSlower in the wetevery car, re-runThe cost of altitudeevery car, re-runThe cost of a passengerevery car, re-run
Suzuki 0-60 timesevery modelVolkswagen 0-60 timesevery modelFastest hatchbacks4,527 cars

Try another matchup

Put this race on your own page

Free to use anywhere, no attribution required beyond the credit line included above. How to embed →

Or open the full simulator →

Questions

Is the Suzuki Swift 1.2 Dualjet or the Volkswagen Polo 1.0 TSI 95 faster?
The Volkswagen Polo 1.0 TSI 95. Over a standing quarter mile it runs 17.45 s to the Suzuki Swift 1.2 Dualjet's 18.16 s, a margin of 0.71 s, and it reaches 60 mph in 9.92 s against 10.85 s. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
What is the Suzuki Swift 1.2 Dualjet 0-60 time?
The Suzuki Swift 1.2 Dualjet reaches 60 mph in 10.85 s, simulated on dry asphalt at 20 °C with a 1 ft rollout. It covers the standing quarter mile in 18.16 s at 77.7 mph.
What is the Volkswagen Polo 1.0 TSI 95 0-60 time?
The Volkswagen Polo 1.0 TSI 95 reaches 60 mph in 9.92 s, simulated on dry asphalt at 20 °C with a 1 ft rollout. It covers the standing quarter mile in 17.45 s at 78.8 mph.
What trap speed does each car run?
The Suzuki Swift 1.2 Dualjet trips the lights at 77.7 mph and the Volkswagen Polo 1.0 TSI 95 at 78.8 mph at the end of the quarter mile. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
Are these real measured times?
No. Every time on this page is produced by a physics simulation, not by a stopwatch at a drag strip. Each car is modelled from its published kerb mass, rated power, drivetrain and gearing, then trimmed until it matches its own published acceleration figures — 2 of 2 for the Suzuki Swift 1.2 Dualjet and 2 of 2 for the Volkswagen Polo 1.0 TSI 95. Conditions are identical for both cars: dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.

Figures regenerated 2026-10-12. Every number on this page is computed by the simulator at build time, so the page and the app can never disagree.