Toyota Aygo X 1.0 VVT-i 72 vs Suzuki Swift 1.2 Dualjet
Over a standing quarter mile on dry asphalt the Suzuki Swift 1.2 Dualjet is the quicker car,
covering it in 18.16 s at
77.7 mph against the Toyota Aygo X 1.0 VVT-i 72’s
19.80 s — a margin of
1.64 s. To 60 mph the Suzuki Swift 1.2 Dualjet takes
10.85 s and the Toyota Aygo X 1.0 VVT-i 72
14.14 s.
Simulated, not measured — computed from each car’s published kerb mass,
rated power and drivetrain, then fitted to its own published acceleration figures.
Dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.
Toyota Aygo X 1.0 VVT-i 72Suzuki Swift 1.2 Dualjet
Watch the run in full — then change the surface, the weather
or the distance and run it again.
Down the strip
Standing start
Toyota Aygo X 1.0 VVT-i 72
Suzuki Swift 1.2 Dualjet
0–60 mph
14.14 s
10.85 s
0–100 mph
—
—
60 ft
3.07 s
3.09 s
1/8 mile
12.72 s
11.82 s
1/4 mile
19.80 s
18.16 s
Trap speed
69.5 mph
77.7 mph
Each car is trimmed to its own published figures —
2/2 for the Toyota Aygo X 1.0 VVT-i 72,
2/2 for the Suzuki Swift 1.2 Dualjet —
so a heavier car can still be the quicker one if that is what it tests.
Is the Toyota Aygo X 1.0 VVT-i 72 or the Suzuki Swift 1.2 Dualjet faster?
The Suzuki Swift 1.2 Dualjet. Over a standing quarter mile it runs 18.16 s to the Toyota Aygo X 1.0 VVT-i 72's 19.80 s, a margin of 1.64 s, and it reaches 60 mph in 10.85 s against 14.14 s. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
What is the Toyota Aygo X 1.0 VVT-i 72 0-60 time?
The Toyota Aygo X 1.0 VVT-i 72 reaches 60 mph in 14.14 s, simulated on dry asphalt at 20 °C with a 1 ft rollout. It covers the standing quarter mile in 19.80 s at 69.5 mph.
What is the Suzuki Swift 1.2 Dualjet 0-60 time?
The Suzuki Swift 1.2 Dualjet reaches 60 mph in 10.85 s, simulated on dry asphalt at 20 °C with a 1 ft rollout. It covers the standing quarter mile in 18.16 s at 77.7 mph.
What trap speed does each car run?
The Toyota Aygo X 1.0 VVT-i 72 trips the lights at 69.5 mph and the Suzuki Swift 1.2 Dualjet at 77.7 mph at the end of the quarter mile. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
Are these real measured times?
No. Every time on this page is produced by a physics simulation, not by a stopwatch at a drag strip. Each car is modelled from its published kerb mass, rated power, drivetrain and gearing, then trimmed until it matches its own published acceleration figures — 2 of 2 for the Toyota Aygo X 1.0 VVT-i 72 and 2 of 2 for the Suzuki Swift 1.2 Dualjet. Conditions are identical for both cars: dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.
Figures regenerated 2026-10-12. Every number on this page is computed by the simulator at build time, so the page and the app can never disagree.