← My Auto Racer All cars Comparisons Answers 0-60 by make Fastest lists

Hyundai Kona 1.6 177 vs Volvo V60 Polestar 2.0 367

Over a standing quarter mile on dry asphalt the Volvo V60 Polestar 2.0 367 is the quicker car, covering it in 12.82 s at 105.9 mph against the Hyundai Kona 1.6 177’s 15.47 s — a margin of 2.65 s. To 60 mph the Volvo V60 Polestar 2.0 367 takes 4.30 s and the Hyundai Kona 1.6 177 7.01 s.

Simulated, not measured — computed from each car’s published kerb mass, rated power and drivetrain, then fitted to its own published acceleration figures. Dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.

Hyundai Kona 1.6 177 Volvo V60 Polestar 2.0 367

Watch the run in full — then change the surface, the weather or the distance and run it again.

Down the strip

Standing startHyundai Kona 1.6 177Volvo V60 Polestar 2.0 367
0–60 mph7.01 s4.30 s
0–100 mph—11.06 s
60 ft2.15 s1.86 s
1/8 mile9.77 s8.18 s
1/4 mile15.47 s12.82 s
Trap speed86.1 mph105.9 mph

Each car is trimmed to its own published figures — 2/2 for the Hyundai Kona 1.6 177, 2/2 for the Volvo V60 Polestar 2.0 367 — so a heavier car can still be the quicker one if that is what it tests.

On paper

SpecificationHyundai Kona 1.6 177Volvo V60 Polestar 2.0 367
Year20172013
Power174 bhp362 bhp
Kerb mass1,401 kg1,601 kg
Power to weight124 bhp/t226 bhp/t
DrivetrainAll-wheel driveAll-wheel drive
EngineTurbochargedTurbocharged

Where these times sit

0-60 under 5 seconds2,159 cars0-100 km/h under 5 seconds1,846 carsQuarter mile under 13 seconds1,639 cars0-100 under 12 seconds1,964 carsSlower in the wetevery car, re-runThe cost of altitudeevery car, re-runThe cost of a passengerevery car, re-run
Hyundai 0-60 timesevery modelVolvo 0-60 timesevery modelFastest 4x4s and all-wheel-drive cars2,989 carsFastest cars of the 2010s4,546 cars

Try another matchup

Put this race on your own page

Free to use anywhere, no attribution required beyond the credit line included above. How to embed →

Or open the full simulator →

Questions

Is the Hyundai Kona 1.6 177 or the Volvo V60 Polestar 2.0 367 faster?
The Volvo V60 Polestar 2.0 367. Over a standing quarter mile it runs 12.82 s to the Hyundai Kona 1.6 177's 15.47 s, a margin of 2.65 s, and it reaches 60 mph in 4.30 s against 7.01 s. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
What is the Hyundai Kona 1.6 177 0-60 time?
The Hyundai Kona 1.6 177 reaches 60 mph in 7.01 s, simulated on dry asphalt at 20 °C with a 1 ft rollout. It covers the standing quarter mile in 15.47 s at 86.1 mph.
What is the Volvo V60 Polestar 2.0 367 0-60 time?
The Volvo V60 Polestar 2.0 367 reaches 60 mph in 4.30 s, simulated on dry asphalt at 20 °C with a 1 ft rollout. It covers the standing quarter mile in 12.82 s at 105.9 mph.
What trap speed does each car run?
The Hyundai Kona 1.6 177 trips the lights at 86.1 mph and the Volvo V60 Polestar 2.0 367 at 105.9 mph at the end of the quarter mile. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
Are these real measured times?
No. Every time on this page is produced by a physics simulation, not by a stopwatch at a drag strip. Each car is modelled from its published kerb mass, rated power, drivetrain and gearing, then trimmed until it matches its own published acceleration figures — 2 of 2 for the Hyundai Kona 1.6 177 and 2 of 2 for the Volvo V60 Polestar 2.0 367. Conditions are identical for both cars: dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.

Figures regenerated 2026-10-12. Every number on this page is computed by the simulator at build time, so the page and the app can never disagree.