Jaguar XF Sportbrake 2.0 163 vs Kia Stinger 2.0T 245 PS
Over a standing quarter mile on dry asphalt the Kia Stinger 2.0T 245 PS is the quicker car,
covering it in 14.34 s at
97.8 mph against the Jaguar XF Sportbrake 2.0 163’s
16.48 s — a margin of
2.14 s. To 60 mph the Kia Stinger 2.0T 245 PS takes
5.77 s and the Jaguar XF Sportbrake 2.0 163
8.41 s.
Simulated, not measured — computed from each car’s published kerb mass,
rated power and drivetrain, then fitted to its own published acceleration figures.
Dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.
Watch the run in full — then change the surface, the weather
or the distance and run it again.
Down the strip
Standing start
Jaguar XF Sportbrake 2.0 163
Kia Stinger 2.0T 245 PS
0–60 mph
8.41 s
5.77 s
0–100 mph
—
—
60 ft
2.52 s
2.30 s
1/8 mile
10.59 s
9.30 s
1/4 mile
16.48 s
14.34 s
Trap speed
85.0 mph
97.8 mph
Each car is trimmed to its own published figures —
2/2 for the Jaguar XF Sportbrake 2.0 163,
9/10 for the Kia Stinger 2.0T 245 PS —
so a heavier car can still be the quicker one if that is what it tests.
Is the Jaguar XF Sportbrake 2.0 163 or the Kia Stinger 2.0T 245 PS faster?
The Kia Stinger 2.0T 245 PS. Over a standing quarter mile it runs 14.34 s to the Jaguar XF Sportbrake 2.0 163's 16.48 s, a margin of 2.14 s, and it reaches 60 mph in 5.77 s against 8.41 s. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
What is the Jaguar XF Sportbrake 2.0 163 0-60 time?
The Jaguar XF Sportbrake 2.0 163 reaches 60 mph in 8.41 s, simulated on dry asphalt at 20 °C with a 1 ft rollout. It covers the standing quarter mile in 16.48 s at 85.0 mph.
What is the Kia Stinger 2.0T 245 PS 0-60 time?
The Kia Stinger 2.0T 245 PS reaches 60 mph in 5.77 s, simulated on dry asphalt at 20 °C with a 1 ft rollout. It covers the standing quarter mile in 14.34 s at 97.8 mph.
What trap speed does each car run?
The Jaguar XF Sportbrake 2.0 163 trips the lights at 85.0 mph and the Kia Stinger 2.0T 245 PS at 97.8 mph at the end of the quarter mile. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
Are these real measured times?
No. Every time on this page is produced by a physics simulation, not by a stopwatch at a drag strip. Each car is modelled from its published kerb mass, rated power, drivetrain and gearing, then trimmed until it matches its own published acceleration figures — 2 of 2 for the Jaguar XF Sportbrake 2.0 163 and 9 of 10 for the Kia Stinger 2.0T 245 PS. Conditions are identical for both cars: dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.
Figures regenerated 2026-10-12. Every number on this page is computed by the simulator at build time, so the page and the app can never disagree.