← My Auto Racer All cars Comparisons Answers 0-60 by make Fastest lists

Mercedes-Benz C Class C 160 129 vs Jaguar XF Sportbrake 2.0 163

Over a standing quarter mile on dry asphalt the Jaguar XF Sportbrake 2.0 163 is the quicker car, covering it in 16.48 s at 85.0 mph against the Mercedes-Benz C Class C 160 129’s 16.76 s — a margin of 0.28 s. To 60 mph the Jaguar XF Sportbrake 2.0 163 takes 8.41 s and the Mercedes-Benz C Class C 160 129 8.84 s.

Simulated, not measured — computed from each car’s published kerb mass, rated power and drivetrain, then fitted to its own published acceleration figures. Dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.

Mercedes-Benz C Class C 160 129 Jaguar XF Sportbrake 2.0 163

Watch the run in full — then change the surface, the weather or the distance and run it again.

Down the strip

Standing startMercedes-Benz C Class C 160 129Jaguar XF Sportbrake 2.0 163
0–60 mph8.84 s8.41 s
0–100 mph——
60 ft2.59 s2.52 s
1/8 mile10.77 s10.59 s
1/4 mile16.76 s16.48 s
Trap speed83.1 mph85.0 mph

Each car is trimmed to its own published figures — 2/2 for the Mercedes-Benz C Class C 160 129, 2/2 for the Jaguar XF Sportbrake 2.0 163 — so a heavier car can still be the quicker one if that is what it tests.

On paper

SpecificationMercedes-Benz C Class C 160 129Jaguar XF Sportbrake 2.0 163
Year20182017
Power127 bhp161 bhp
Kerb mass1,419 kg1,660 kg
Power to weight90 bhp/t97 bhp/t
DrivetrainRear driveRear drive
EngineNaturally aspiratedTurbodiesel

Where these times sit

0-60 under 10 seconds10,147 cars0-100 km/h under 10 seconds9,071 carsSlower in the wetevery car, re-runThe cost of altitudeevery car, re-runThe cost of a passengerevery car, re-run
Mercedes-Benz 0-60 timesevery modelJaguar 0-60 timesevery modelFastest cars of the 2010s4,546 cars

Try another matchup

Put this race on your own page

Free to use anywhere, no attribution required beyond the credit line included above. How to embed →

Or open the full simulator →

Questions

Is the Mercedes-Benz C Class C 160 129 or the Jaguar XF Sportbrake 2.0 163 faster?
The Jaguar XF Sportbrake 2.0 163. Over a standing quarter mile it runs 16.48 s to the Mercedes-Benz C Class C 160 129's 16.76 s, a margin of 0.28 s, and it reaches 60 mph in 8.41 s against 8.84 s. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
What is the Mercedes-Benz C Class C 160 129 0-60 time?
The Mercedes-Benz C Class C 160 129 reaches 60 mph in 8.84 s, simulated on dry asphalt at 20 °C with a 1 ft rollout. It covers the standing quarter mile in 16.76 s at 83.1 mph.
What is the Jaguar XF Sportbrake 2.0 163 0-60 time?
The Jaguar XF Sportbrake 2.0 163 reaches 60 mph in 8.41 s, simulated on dry asphalt at 20 °C with a 1 ft rollout. It covers the standing quarter mile in 16.48 s at 85.0 mph.
What trap speed does each car run?
The Mercedes-Benz C Class C 160 129 trips the lights at 83.1 mph and the Jaguar XF Sportbrake 2.0 163 at 85.0 mph at the end of the quarter mile. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
Are these real measured times?
No. Every time on this page is produced by a physics simulation, not by a stopwatch at a drag strip. Each car is modelled from its published kerb mass, rated power, drivetrain and gearing, then trimmed until it matches its own published acceleration figures — 2 of 2 for the Mercedes-Benz C Class C 160 129 and 2 of 2 for the Jaguar XF Sportbrake 2.0 163. Conditions are identical for both cars: dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.

Figures regenerated 2026-10-12. Every number on this page is computed by the simulator at build time, so the page and the app can never disagree.