← My Auto Racer All cars Comparisons Answers 0-60 by make Fastest lists

Volvo V60 1.6 E85 180 (2014) vs Jaguar XF Sportbrake 2.0 163

Over a standing quarter mile on dry asphalt the Volvo V60 1.6 E85 180 (2014) is the quicker car, covering it in 16.42 s at 85.6 mph against the Jaguar XF Sportbrake 2.0 163’s 16.48 s — a margin of 0.06 s. To 60 mph the Volvo V60 1.6 E85 180 (2014) takes 8.33 s and the Jaguar XF Sportbrake 2.0 163 8.41 s.

Simulated, not measured — computed from each car’s published kerb mass, rated power and drivetrain, then fitted to its own published acceleration figures. Dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.

Volvo V60 1.6 E85 180 (2014) Jaguar XF Sportbrake 2.0 163

Watch the run in full — then change the surface, the weather or the distance and run it again.

Down the strip

Standing startVolvo V60 1.6 E85 180 (2014)Jaguar XF Sportbrake 2.0 163
0–60 mph8.33 s8.41 s
0–100 mph——
60 ft2.53 s2.52 s
1/8 mile10.58 s10.59 s
1/4 mile16.42 s16.48 s
Trap speed85.6 mph85.0 mph

Each car is trimmed to its own published figures — 2/2 for the Volvo V60 1.6 E85 180 (2014), 2/2 for the Jaguar XF Sportbrake 2.0 163 — so a heavier car can still be the quicker one if that is what it tests.

On paper

SpecificationVolvo V60 1.6 E85 180 (2014)Jaguar XF Sportbrake 2.0 163
Year20142017
Power177 bhp161 bhp
Kerb mass1,637 kg1,660 kg
Power to weight108 bhp/t97 bhp/t
DrivetrainFront driveRear drive
EngineTurbochargedTurbodiesel

Where these times sit

0-60 under 10 seconds10,147 cars0-100 km/h under 10 seconds9,071 carsSlower in the wetevery car, re-runThe cost of altitudeevery car, re-runThe cost of a passengerevery car, re-run
Volvo 0-60 timesevery modelJaguar 0-60 timesevery modelFastest cars of the 2010s4,546 cars

Try another matchup

Put this race on your own page

Free to use anywhere, no attribution required beyond the credit line included above. How to embed →

Or open the full simulator →

Questions

Is the Volvo V60 1.6 E85 180 (2014) or the Jaguar XF Sportbrake 2.0 163 faster?
The Volvo V60 1.6 E85 180 (2014). Over a standing quarter mile it runs 16.42 s to the Jaguar XF Sportbrake 2.0 163's 16.48 s, a margin of 0.06 s, and it reaches 60 mph in 8.33 s against 8.41 s. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
What is the Volvo V60 1.6 E85 180 (2014) 0-60 time?
The Volvo V60 1.6 E85 180 (2014) reaches 60 mph in 8.33 s, simulated on dry asphalt at 20 °C with a 1 ft rollout. It covers the standing quarter mile in 16.42 s at 85.6 mph.
What is the Jaguar XF Sportbrake 2.0 163 0-60 time?
The Jaguar XF Sportbrake 2.0 163 reaches 60 mph in 8.41 s, simulated on dry asphalt at 20 °C with a 1 ft rollout. It covers the standing quarter mile in 16.48 s at 85.0 mph.
What trap speed does each car run?
The Volvo V60 1.6 E85 180 (2014) trips the lights at 85.6 mph and the Jaguar XF Sportbrake 2.0 163 at 85.0 mph at the end of the quarter mile. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
Are these real measured times?
No. Every time on this page is produced by a physics simulation, not by a stopwatch at a drag strip. Each car is modelled from its published kerb mass, rated power, drivetrain and gearing, then trimmed until it matches its own published acceleration figures — 2 of 2 for the Volvo V60 1.6 E85 180 (2014) and 2 of 2 for the Jaguar XF Sportbrake 2.0 163. Conditions are identical for both cars: dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.

Figures regenerated 2026-10-12. Every number on this page is computed by the simulator at build time, so the page and the app can never disagree.