Toyota AURIS 1.4 4D 90 vs Suzuki Swift 1.2 Dualjet
Over a standing quarter mile on dry asphalt the Toyota AURIS 1.4 4D 90 is the quicker car,
covering it in 18.15 s at
74.9 mph against the Suzuki Swift 1.2 Dualjet’s
18.16 s — a margin of
0.01 s. To 60 mph the Toyota AURIS 1.4 4D 90 takes
11.34 s and the Suzuki Swift 1.2 Dualjet
10.85 s.
Simulated, not measured — computed from each car’s published kerb mass,
rated power and drivetrain, then fitted to its own published acceleration figures.
Dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.
Toyota AURIS 1.4 4D 90Suzuki Swift 1.2 Dualjet
Watch the run in full — then change the surface, the weather
or the distance and run it again.
Down the strip
Standing start
Toyota AURIS 1.4 4D 90
Suzuki Swift 1.2 Dualjet
0–60 mph
11.34 s
10.85 s
0–100 mph
—
—
60 ft
2.67 s
3.09 s
1/8 mile
11.61 s
11.82 s
1/4 mile
18.15 s
18.16 s
Trap speed
74.9 mph
77.7 mph
Each car is trimmed to its own published figures —
2/2 for the Toyota AURIS 1.4 4D 90,
2/2 for the Suzuki Swift 1.2 Dualjet —
so a heavier car can still be the quicker one if that is what it tests.
Is the Toyota AURIS 1.4 4D 90 or the Suzuki Swift 1.2 Dualjet faster?
The Toyota AURIS 1.4 4D 90. Over a standing quarter mile it runs 18.15 s to the Suzuki Swift 1.2 Dualjet's 18.16 s, a margin of 0.01 s, and it reaches 60 mph in 11.34 s against 10.85 s. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
What is the Toyota AURIS 1.4 4D 90 0-60 time?
The Toyota AURIS 1.4 4D 90 reaches 60 mph in 11.34 s, simulated on dry asphalt at 20 °C with a 1 ft rollout. It covers the standing quarter mile in 18.15 s at 74.9 mph.
What is the Suzuki Swift 1.2 Dualjet 0-60 time?
The Suzuki Swift 1.2 Dualjet reaches 60 mph in 10.85 s, simulated on dry asphalt at 20 °C with a 1 ft rollout. It covers the standing quarter mile in 18.16 s at 77.7 mph.
What trap speed does each car run?
The Toyota AURIS 1.4 4D 90 trips the lights at 74.9 mph and the Suzuki Swift 1.2 Dualjet at 77.7 mph at the end of the quarter mile. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
Are these real measured times?
No. Every time on this page is produced by a physics simulation, not by a stopwatch at a drag strip. Each car is modelled from its published kerb mass, rated power, drivetrain and gearing, then trimmed until it matches its own published acceleration figures — 2 of 2 for the Toyota AURIS 1.4 4D 90 and 2 of 2 for the Suzuki Swift 1.2 Dualjet. Conditions are identical for both cars: dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.
Figures regenerated 2026-10-12. Every number on this page is computed by the simulator at build time, so the page and the app can never disagree.